I should be writing about Santa Claus, jingle bells, and sexy carol singers, but here I am, typing away about firearms instead. All because some people refuse to educate themselves on the matter.
Pictured above, is a
Sturmgewehr 44 (Storm Rifle 44), a German WW2 weapon that appeared on the battlefield late in the war. It is recognised as the world's very first "Assault Rifle"
[wiki] and it was named as such by none other than Adolf Hitler himself. Hitler initially didn't like the idea of a gun that could act as both a rifle and machine gun, feeling that automatic-fire was too crude for a skilled rifleman, but he eventually gave the go ahead for mass production. Tragically, for the German troops, it was too late in the war for it to make any difference for them. Still, the firearm spawned a whole new genre of weapon that now dominates in all sorts of conflict zones (even in Syria today, insurgents can be seen using Sturmgewehrs, a testament to their lasting usability). In case it wasn't obvious from the Hitler anecdote above, the crucial factor in deciding what constitutes an "Assault Rifle" is the ability to switch between semi-auto, and fully automatic firing modes. This is important. If you dismiss everything else from this post, trust me on this definition.

In the wake of the James Holmes massacre, every gun-nut came out of the woodwork. I say gun-nut, and gun-nut usually means some American NRA member who masturbates with gun oil, but instead I mean the other type of gun-nut. The gun-nut that always manages to replace intelligence with irrational arsehole emotion. The freaks who get palpitations at the sight of a man carrying two lengths of copper pipe, coming out of a plumbing store. These gun-nuts usually make themselves apparent by the disproportional ratio of fear-mongering to gun-knowledge, coming out with with nonsense like: "
Pump action Ak47s".
And now we have another tragic mass-killing in America, where some unhappy teen, who probably felt their life was ruined because [insert your own trivial reason here]
, has gone on a rampage in a school killing 20 children. And yes, of course. The gun-nuts are out in force again.

"ASSAULT RIFLES!!!1! HE WAS USING ASSAULT RIFLES" the moron millions scream. Michael Moore tweeted about how the gun could fire "
30 rounds a pop". Sure Michael, 30 a "pop", whatever the hell that means. Just like with the James Holmes incident, and even the Anders Breivik case, the rifle used in this crime was NOT an "assault rifle", it was a semi-automatic rifle. What causes confusion with the simpleton commentators and untalented journos, is the fact that the weapons used have a similar look (black stock, tactical rail) to their assault rifle cousins. But if looking like an assault rifle makes it an assault rifle, then millions of assault rifles are available for toy-stores around the world. Indeed, this fact that we encourage children [boys] play with toy guns brings up an important aspect: gun culture and the cult of the gun.
It never fails to surprise me that those most vocal about banning guns are the same "liberals" who get enraged by any notion of censorship. "
No way man, computer games don't make no one go mad, man". "
I fuckin love seeing da kidz getting shot-up on the big screen". They see it as being unfair that it's their "hobby" and not someone elses, that is brought into the firing line. Whether there is any merit in mentioning violent games and films when discussing mass-killings, there is a troubling reality that cultural fantasy seems to play a big part in these actions. When Anders Breivik bought his Mini 14 semi-auto rifle, he did so because, as he said in his own words: "
It is the most 'army like' rifle allowed in Norway". Given the amount of photos of him posing with his weapons, it's clear that image was important to Breivik, killing wasn't good enough, he had to look the part. The same goes for a lot of these modern killers, including James Holmes, who was dressed from head to toe in black body armour, more for fashion than function.

After the recent incident in the Sandy Hook school, US' President Obama went on to give a speech filled with stilted tears. What an atrocious move. It was the cherry on the cake of the increasing sensationalising of mass killers. The media just can't seem to ejaculate enough coverage of these incidents. They are doing their best to turn murderers into infamous anti-heroes. On one channel you have meek and unhappy teens being giving three X's by the judges on the X Factor, never to be heard of again, but on the next channel, you have wall-to-wall coverage of the latest gun-killer. Pictures and details, all up there; the persons entire life, for everyone to see. And now, not only will mass-murder make you famous, reaching the entire world, but you can also directly affect the President of America. A really ill thought move by the president, more so, if the tears were actually just theatrics.
I have always thought that American gun laws are crazy. Keep gun ownership legal, if you like, but selling them over-the-counter like power tools just doesn't make for a "safer America". Americans can scream back and forth about the semantics of the Second Amendment, but guns will never be used to "take back the country". That notion is as dead as Washington himself. If owning a gun makes you think that you are "free" then god help you. You better pack an extra few tins of beans in you
prepper' bag, cos freedom's going to be gone for a while. Any future "tough" gun laws must not include "Grandfathering" of existing guns. If you're going to introduce laws, do it right. Anything else is just optics, and will fail like the laws of the past.

No one should be surprised that people kill people. Murder is natural for humans. I just wonder about all these recent cases though. It's as if something has changed, or something more is going on. That's why I think it's more important that we root out the real cause of all this "nu" violence, and not just go around putting up a façade of fixing the problem by simply taking away an object that facilitates murder. Harold Shipman didn't need a gun to kill over 250 people, nor will the future "xFactor" mass-killer. Removing guns is damage limitation, not damage prevention. Don't dress it up as such.